Bernard Helyer Wrote: > We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not, > will be through omission. Off the top of my head: > > *delete will not be implemented. > *scope classes will not be implemented. > *complex numbers will not be implemented. > *version/debug levels will not be implemented, as their semantics > are poorly documented, and I've never seen them used in any code > anywhere. > *C style function pointers will not be supported. > *The D calling convention will not be matched, at least not in 1.0 > (extern (D) is currently fastcall) > *D's forward reference and module order bugs will not be > supported. > > And others I've probably forgotten. In terms of release date, I > can't really say, sorry. Currently working on the D interpreter > for CTFE and constant expressions, if you're interested. :D > > > -Bernard. >
So many features are not implemented can be compatible with dmd2 ? In addition , the current sdc in what state? Feature list is up to date? what time is expected time to be completed for 0.1? Good luck! dolive
