On 12/18/11 4:53 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 18 December 2011 at 20:32:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That is an interesting opportunity. At any rate, I am 100% convinced
precise GC is the only way to go, and I think I've convinced Walter to
a good extent as well.
Sacrificing something (performance, executable size) for something else
is not an unilateral improvement.
I think we can do a lot toward improving the footprint and performance
of a precise GC while benefitting of its innate advantages.
Andrei
