On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:30:01 +0200, Walter Bright
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/30/2011 5:59 PM, so wrote:
Well not them but another dummy function, i didn't think it would
differ this much.
It differs that much because once it is inlined, the optimizer deletes
it because it does nothing.
I don't think it is a valid test.
Yes i can see from asm output but are we talking about same thing?
@inline IS all about that. We can try it with any example, one
outperforming the other is not the point.
for(....)
fun()
With or without @inline i know fun should/will get folded away, then why
should i pay for the function call?
