Jonathan M Davis wrote: > I think > that on some level, the unit test framework in the language has failed if > we have to add library solutions on top of it to get such basic > functionality.
That's what we are saying: The unit test framework fails for us and a library solution is perfectly possible, even one that lets everyone use the build in functionality if he wants. You don't find it useful, but others do. I'd say: many others do. If something is considered useful by many it should have a place in the standard library.
