"Nick Sabalausky" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > "Peter Alexander" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> 2. The -property flag *creates* a new kind of error, but doesn't actually >> help find real problems with your code. Without properties, member >> function access would always be a.b(), and this artificial error could be >> avoided. >> > > Bullshit. Without properties, member function access *ANY* many value > accesses are "a.b()". Is this member value a plain-old-var or a function? > Who knows! It's a leeked out implementation detail, hooray! >
Obviously, I need to re-proofread *after* I edit... ;) The: "...member function access *ANY* many..." Should be: "...member function accesses *AND* many..." (Little less grammatically non-sensical that way ;) )
