On Saturday, January 21, 2012 21:54:37 Nick Sabalausky wrote: > It wouldn't have to change, just have a better name added. No reason > 'size_t', et al, couldn't still be kept for compatibility.
Except that we're generally against keeping around alias cruft like that except temporarily as part of a deprecation path, so that doesn't usually fly. Certainly, it means that if you want that to happen, you'd then have to be able to come up with a name and arguments for it which justified having two standard aliases for the same thing. - Jonathan M Davis
