On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:00:06 +0100 torhu <[email protected]> wrote: > It's also a great benefit to be able to rely on wxWidgets' available > examples and documentation, which might outweigh most benefits you > can get by improving or D-ifying the API. Adding more convenient > ways of doing things on top of the existing API should be fine, > though.
I believe it's possible to D-ify C++ API so that it's still easy to consult original wx docs as well as have nice higher-level API. At least, it is possible in e.g. wxhaskell... Sincerely, Gour -- It is far better to discharge one's prescribed duties, even though faultily, than another's duties perfectly. Destruction in the course of performing one's own duty is better than engaging in another's duties, for to follow another's path is dangerous. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
