On 01/27/2012 02:24 AM, Simen Kjærås wrote:
A pattern in D is this:
alias Foo!q{
stuffs
} MyFoo;
Where Foo is a templated struct/class. In many ways, this is similar to
defining a new type, and I therefore throw out the suggestion that the
syntax should reflect this. I may be wrong, but I think this syntax is
unused and fitting:
Foo MyFoo!q{
stuffs
}
This is clearly symmetrical with the definition of normal types:
class MyClass {
}
struct MyStruct {
}
enum MyEnum {
}
Critique? Thoughts?
It looks like Yoda speak to me. I don't think it is going to fly. If we
get alias name = othername; as has been suggested a few times, your
example would look like:
alias MyFoo = Foo!q{
}
Is that good enough?
