On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:19:37PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Thursday, February 02, 2012 18:34:34 H. S. Teoh wrote: [...] > > Are there any *good* reasons why druntime and libphobos are not > > dynamically linked? In the long run, we need to support that, since > > otherwise D binaries will be unnecessarily large and the OS won't be > > able to optimize memory usage by sharing library images with > > multiple processes. > > Because dmd does not yet support shared libraries on Linux. [...]
Hmph. Since gdc *does* support shared libraries (I think?), it should be possible, at least in principle, no? T -- I think Debian's doing something wrong, `apt-get install pesticide', doesn't seem to remove the bugs on my system! -- Mike Dresser
