C.blub4 - yes, it looks like a bug A.blub3 - I've seen a bug about this somewhere in bugzilla, and it's debatable whether it's a bug or not. Private functions are not virtual, so it doesn't override anything, it just uses the same name as an interface method. Allowing override here is probably a bug.
- is it a bug? protection attributes on interfaces/abstracts... dennis luehring
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on interfaces/... Daniel Murphy
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on interfa... dennis luehring
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on int... Daniel Murphy
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on... dennis luehring
- Re: is it a bug? protection attribut... Daniel Murphy
- Re: is it a bug? protection attr... dennis luehring
- Re: is it a bug? protection ... David Nadlinger
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on int... Manfred Nowak
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on... dennis luehring
- Re: is it a bug? protection attribut... Manfred Nowak
- Re: is it a bug? protection attributes on interfaces/... Martin Nowak
