Under D1, std.c.windows.windows has HANDLE it as a typedef of void*. While I forget
whether they're actually pointers. I guess it fits given that the C headers define it as
void* and that handles are fundamentally different from pointers from an app's point of view.
Under D2, core.sys.windows.windows has it as an alias of void*.
In the WindowsAPI bindings, the definition of HANDLE is versioned to this
effect.
But there ought to be a better way of dealing with it. Anyone got any thoughts? Are
there any plans at the moment for the future of the HANDLE type?
Stewart.
