On Wednesday, 8 February 2012 at 01:33:51 UTC, James Miller wrote:
As somebody that frequently laments the lack of documentation
I'm a bit of a hypocrite here; I'll complain until the cows come home about /other/ people's crappy documentation... then turn around and do a bad job at it myself. I tried to do cgi.d overview: http://arsdnet.net/web.d/cgi.d.html ddoc: http://arsdnet.net/web.d/cgi.html But I still have a lot to do on web.d documentation. The best source there is probably random newsgroup posts, (better than the comments in the code!) and I've changed things more than once too.
Adam's stuff is very good
Thanks!
It would be cool if we ended up with a set of independent modules that worked well together but had few dependencies.
Yeah, I think that would be great. If you want to modify my files, you can always fork it, but the best way is probably to do a pull request on the github. I try to reply to those quickly, and we can try to keep one copy there to avoid duplication of effort. Then, add on modules outside the scope of the code can be done by anyone. I'd put links to stuff in the documentation, so it is easy to find extended functionality.
