> > I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much > > does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta instead of > > 2.057? This upcoming release has several new garbage collector > > optimizations. If the GC is the bottleneck, then it's not surprising
Is there a way to "turn off" the GC, e.g. a compiler switch to set the heap size to a large number so that the GC is likely not to set in? I searched through this page: http://www.d-programming-language.org/dmd-windows.html#switches But couldn't find anything helpful. Then you could measure the thing with GC "turned off" to see whether the GC is the problem or not. -- Oliver -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
