On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:00:39PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > On 2/16/2012 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >Well, in that case, we should replace 'in' with '∈'. > > I would, but that doesn't work because of keyboarding issues.
I wasn't being serious. I was going to suggest to those who complain about && being too similar to &, that we should adopt ∧ and ∨ instead. Nice and readable, and unambiguous. And we could use ∀ instead of 'foreach'; that would save so much typing! I mean, D is already standardized on Unicode, why not take advantage of all those nice symbols that Unicode provides? ;-) (As long as you don't mention APL, everybody will be just fine.) T -- If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito. -- Jan van Steenbergen
