On 21 February 2012 09:02, Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-02-20 17:17, Daniel Murphy wrote: >> >> "H. S. Teoh"<[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> >>> I've suggested before, and would suggest it again, that it would be nice >>> if dmd had an option, or came with another standalone tool, that can >>> display the fully-expanded type of something, as the compiler would have >>> understood it. For example: >>> >> >> This sounds like dmd's json output, but even less implemented and >> requiring >> repeated lexing/parsing/semantic. >> >> It would make a lot more sense with the compiler as a library. > > > Exactly. We basically need Clang for D, preferably written in D. > > -- > /Jacob Carlborg
libclang is awesome, so libdmd should be /more/ awesome, right? -- James Miller
