On 20/02/2012 19:11, Johannes Pfau wrote: <snip>
Exactly what's written there, c_long and c_ulong always match the C long/ulong types, whatever size those may be. It's mostly (only?) useful for C bindings.
So in other words, it just means whatever somebody has decreed that the "long" keyword in C shall mean on that platform.
When did C gain a type called ulong, anyway? Are we going to have c_long_long as well? Stewart.
