On Feb 21, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote: >> size_t is intended to be the C representation. I very much do not want to >> end up with a c_size_t. > > Hahah, hold your jaw because it might drop: > > Looking for size_t extravagancies in C, I found that VC uses __int64 > for size_t in x64 target.
I think this is actually a good thing, since working with unsigned integers is a pain. I can't see any system needing that extra bit to represent size any time soon anyway.
