Le 25/02/2012 07:26, Daniel Murphy a écrit :
"Jonathan M Davis"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
However, regardless of which we choose, someone is going to have to take
the
time to implement it, since odds are that Walter isn't going to do it. So,
whether we end up with a feature along these lines is highly dependent on
whether anyone is willing to take the time to implement it and get it
accepted
by Walter.
Waaaay ahead of you here.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/738
It's currently 'catch(auto e : E1, E2, E3)' but changing the syntax is
trivial if everyone decides they want it.
I do think this approach have a flaw. If we go in that direction, then
it push devs to create new Exception type just to catch them, because
this is the only way we have.
If I understand properly your pull request, the compiler will be
duplicating catch block ? If it is the case, would it be possible to use
static if to use type specific stuff of E1, E2 or E3, depending on which
one we are facing ?
BTW, great job, it is definitively a nice addition to have.
jmdavis > good job to synthetize all this. I think you get the most
importants points of the talk.
