Could you give a code example of what you mean? You can still use multiple catch blocks perfectly well with this patch. "Kevin Cox" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... I think there should also be multiple catches so that you can deal with different exceptions different ways without trying to upcast them over and over again.
On Feb 25, 2012 1:30 AM, "Daniel Murphy" <[email protected]> wrote: "Jonathan M Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > However, regardless of which we choose, someone is going to have to take > the > time to implement it, since odds are that Walter isn't going to do it. So, > whether we end up with a feature along these lines is highly dependent on > whether anyone is willing to take the time to implement it and get it > accepted > by Walter. Waaaay ahead of you here. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/738 It's currently 'catch(auto e : E1, E2, E3)' but changing the syntax is trivial if everyone decides they want it.
