Manfred Nowak:

> Satnam Singh [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/satnams/] 
> writes:
> 
> > Not only do lazy pure functional programmers know the cost of
> > nothing, they don't know _when_ they know the cost of nothing.
> 
> on the time (several hours) needed to find and fix a space leak by
> Simon Marlow [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/simonmar/].

Simon Peyton-Jones says that the next Haskell should be strict and pure, the 
next ML should be pure with monads, and that purity is more important than 
laziness. So lazyness is good to have, but it's better to not have it on 
default.

Bye,
bearophile

Reply via email to