Re: package and virtual

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-01 11:12, deadalnix wrote:
Le 01/03/2012 01:53, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
package functions are currenly non-virtual.
The spec claims that "all non-sta­tic non-pri­vate non-tem­plate
mem­ber func­
tions are vir­tual," which would mean that package is supposed to be
virtual.
But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual.
So, is
that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package
going to be
made virtual at some point?

- Jonathan M Davis

I think virtuality and package should have nothing to with one another.
package is supposed ot express visibility, not change behavior.

Currently we don't have a "virtual" keyword, meaning everything would 
need to be virtual.

--
/Jacob Carlborg