On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 02:45:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I would definitely consider that to be a negative. "Threaded"
has it right as
far as I'm concerned. However, I use my e-mail client
primarily, so I'm not
normally one of the users of the web interface.
- Jonathan M Davis
The issue I've been having is threads have been getting very
long, so when I want to see what threads are recieving new
messages (at least those I threads I'm interested in) I'm
scrolling through a bunch of messages. Many times I'm trying to
follow only a single subtree as the others lost my interest, but
I don't know which tree until I know what list I'm looking at. A
mark all as read would be useful too, but it wouldn't solve this
particular lack of an "overview" for threads.
