On 3/13/12 2:57 PM, Manu wrote:
And you think that's more readable and intuitive than: (v1, v2, v3) = fun(); ?
Yes (e.g. when I see the commas my mind starts running in all directions because that's valid code nowadays that ignores v1 and v2 and keeps v3 as an lvalue).
Let me put it another way: I don't see one syntax over another a deal maker or deal breaker. At all.
Andrei
