On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:54 PM, FeepingCreature wrote: > > I think that case is sufficiently rare that it'd have to count somewhere > between "act of god" and "outright developer malice". The assumption that the > stack frame is valid is, I'd say, safe to make in the vast majority of cases. > You pretty much have to actively try to break it, for no clearly discernible > reason.
The prevalence of buffer overflow attacks might suggest otherwise.
