On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:22:31PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > On 3/15/2012 6:23 PM, ixid wrote: > >D is a very poor name for a language. I appreciate it's late in the > >day for this and that it has probably been discussed before (not that > >I could find such a discussion with Google which relates to my > >point).
Yes, this topic has been discussed to death before. On several occasions. And yes, the google searchability factor has also been discussed to death before. Also on multiple occasions. [...] > Searching for "d programming" or "d programming language" works very > well. Actually I find that google has been adapting to me (I'm pretty sure this can't be for everyone, unless D is much more well-known that any of us has ever suspected). Nowadays just combining "d" with a programming related term consistently puts D-related results close to the top of the page. T -- Valentine's Day: an occasion for florists to reach into the wallets of nominal lovers in dire need of being reminded to profess their hypothetical love for their long-forgotten.
