On 18 March 2012 10:56, Adrian <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Currently I use string mixins to force inlining - but that's uggly > Yeah, that's not an acceptable workaround. I couldn't write commercial/large-team code that way.
On 18 March 2012 10:56, Adrian <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Currently I use string mixins to force inlining - but that's uggly > Yeah, that's not an acceptable workaround. I couldn't write commercial/large-team code that way.