On 2012-03-20 19:25, Mantis wrote:
Hello,since people discussed a lot about user-defined attributes recently, I've been thinking about a way to implement it with a string mixins. The problem with them is their syntax - it's far from what we want to use in everyday job. I understand, they should be easily distinguished at use site, but perhaps this may be accomplished in other ways as well. My idea is to translate this kind of statements: # identifier statement into this: mixin( identifier( q{ statement } ) );
I don't like it. I want real user defined attributes. -- /Jacob Carlborg
