On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:17:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-03-21 09:42, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > "Jacob Carlborg"<d...@me.com> wrote in message > > > >> Sure, why not. Do we want an "any" function as well, that is the > >> opposite? > > > > I think "!array.empty" is plenty sufficient. Besides, there are other good > > uses of "any" that have been brought up before. > > Actually I was thinking something like "any?" in Ruby: > > http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.7/Enumerable.html#method-i-any-3F
So, std.algorithm.canFind then? There has been some discussion of renaming it to any (or at least the overload that just takes the predicate and the range), but canFind gives you the behavior regardless. - Jonathan M Davis
