On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:43:28 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:21:21 -0400, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:op.wbjc7au8eav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
As an bonus this gets rid of the controversial behavior of if(array)
translating to if(array.ptr).
Yea, I'm not *necessarily* opposed to "if(array)" translating to
"if(array.length != 0)" (athough it would break code that relies on the
"null vs empty" distinction)
We have discussed ways of introducing this in the least painful way. I
think it should happen, no matter what the pain, since it's the least
obvious choice.
What I mean is the *current behavior* is the least obvious choice :D
-Steve
