On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 10:06:46 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
Indeed, it may be possible to use a new-style delegate literal instead of a string, for defining your DSL. My point was that we don't need to be able to return arbitrary types from operators. Instead, we might need some syntax sugar or library support for getting syntax trees from expressions.
And how exactly do you plan to implement _library_ support for that in the case of expressions containing comparison or equality operators?
David
