On 03/22/2012 07:08 PM, F i L wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 18:06:24 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote:in addition to .codeof, let's think about .astof returning an abstract syntax tree.I agree, as stated on the IRC, .astof (and therefor .astof.toString()) is a much better concept.
I think that would necessitate the addition of AST macros.
