On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 17:44:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:33:33 -0400, Tove <t...@fransson.se>
wrote:
I think this proposal pretty much covers what I would expect
from 'custom attributes'... but what about adding a D twist,
getting "what we annotate" as a template parameter so that one
among other things can make use of Template Constraints?
Interesting, so something like:
@attribute string defaultName(T)() if(is(typeof(T.init.name)))
{ return T.init.name;}
Not sure how much this gives us, but it definitely feels doable.
-Steve
yes, exactly... well, once library designers start getting
creative, one of the immediate benefits would be, easy to
understand error-messages.
