On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 21:22 +0200, Gour wrote: [...] > In any case, as it is often said, I got a feeling that despite its > potential cleanliness, the real-world Haskell code was not so readable.
That probably comes down to familiarity and personal taste. > By deploying some coding discipline, we tend to believe that D can serve > well as FP-language for the masses. :-) Hummm... the really core issue is whether the language supports tail call optimization. Functional programming languages demand it, C, C++, Java, Go, Python definitely don't have it, D... -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
