On Wednesday, 11 April 2012 at 16:08:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Doing something along the lines of:
const a = array ( filter! ... ) ;
foreach ( i ; a ) { ... }
works fine. Question 1 though is why I can't use immutable
here, why I
have to use const.
An array/slice has indirection, you can't implicitly convert it
to immutable.
(IIRC, there is actually an exception for the return type of
strongly pure functions, but your instantiation of 'array' is
evidently not pure enough)
Question 2 is why I can't do:
const a = filter! ... ;
foreach ( i ; a ) { ... }
if I try this I get messages along the lines of:
./signatures_sequential.d(33): Error: function
signatures_sequential.main.filter!(delegate @system bool(string
item)
{
return isDir(cast(const(char[]))item);
}
).filter!(const(immutable(char)[])[]).filter.Result.empty () is
not callable using argument types ()
./signatures_sequential.d(33): Error: function
signatures_sequential.main.filter!(delegate @system bool(string
item)
{
return isDir(cast(const(char[]))item);
}
).filter!(const(immutable(char)[])[]).filter.Result.popFront ()
is not callable using argument types ()
./signatures_sequential.d(33): Error: function
signatures_sequential.main.filter!(delegate @system bool(string
item)
{
return isDir(cast(const(char[]))item);
}
).filter!(const(immutable(char)[])[]).filter.Result.front () is
not callable using argument types ()
which, it has to be said, isn't exactly informative to the user.
Ranges are iterated in-place. You can't mutate a const range,
hence you cannot advance it by one (`popFront`), which is
required by the lowering of foreach using the range interface.
Thanks.
You should be using the D.learn group for these questions.
