On 2012-04-11 16:59, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Jacob Carlborg<[email protected]> wrote:
Could it happen that the linker arguments need to be placed first sometimes ?
If it's a user-created library then maybe. The general rule on Unix is that
dependent objects need to be listed before the object they depend on. I think
the linker only does a single pass. Optlink doesn't have this problem--it's way
nicer in this regard.
That would be the only case where optlink is nicer :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
