A subtle but nasty problem - are default arguments part of the type, or part of
the declaration?
See http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
Currently, they are both, which leads to the nasty behavior in the bug report.
The problem centers around name mangling. If two types mangle the same, then
they are the same type. But default arguments are not part of the mangled
string. Hence the schizophrenic behavior.
But if we make default arguments solely a part of the function declaration, then
function pointers (and delegates) cannot have default arguments. (And maybe this
isn't a bad thing?)
