On 2012-04-28 21:36, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/28/12, Walter Bright<[email protected]> wrote:
What's your list?
I don't mind extra features, just as long as they're properly
documented and implemented. For example, I have absolutely no uses for
anonymous classes right now, but I know DWT2 uses them and probably
other people do use them.
If a anonymous classes where remove from D, life would get even harder
for DWT.
Personally I find the hardest threads to to follow are the ones
discussing in/out/inout/autoref. For one thing there are compiler
bugs, but then there are misconceptions between what developers vs
documentation vs core devs say about them. And then you mix in classes
and templates into the story and it all becomes a large forest of
information that is very hard to digest.
Agree.
Another feature I'm curious about is .dup/.idup. It's basically
hardcoded for a couple of types, but why not instead use UFCS and
implement .dup/.idup in std.array as a free function? Then you might
even use it for user-types by requiring a type to implement .dup/.idup
functions.
Agree with this one as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
