You're looking for 'in ref T'? I was also trying to do this today funnily enough, and it seems a shame this doesn't work. Is this a bug, or is it intended that it's not supported?
On 3 May 2012 21:28, Mehrdad <[email protected]> wrote: > What's wrong with passing a struct as scope ref const? > > I want to avoid copying the struct, and its information is only read > inside the function... >
