On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:57:46 -0700, Adam D. Ruppe
<[email protected]> wrote:
The real WTF is we use .di files for druntime in the
first place. It is performance sensitive and open source.
We should be using the actual sources for inlining, ctfe,
etc. anyway.
Let's not torpedo the .di patch's value for just phobos.
Except that there is a distinct need for the DRuntime as a shared library.
Particularly as end-user software starts relying on multiple shared
libraries. Currently, things just explode when you try to use multiple
libraries of software that link to different versions of the DRT, a shared
lib for DRT would pretty much solve that. Or at least make a solution
possible, but the *only* way to make a DRT shared lib work is DI files
that don't contain implementation.
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
