On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:16:22PM -0400, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 16:04:14 H. S. Teoh wrote: > > Dumb question: what prevents someone from rewriting dmd's backend > > with new code that isn't entangled by the previous license? > > It's a _ton_ of work for arguably little benefit. What we have for dmd > works just fine, and if you want a fully open source backend, you can > use gdc or ldc. [...]
Right, so what's the reason behind not adopting gdc or ldc as the reference compiler? T -- Не дорог подарок, дорога любовь.
