"Victor Vicente de Carvalho" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > I think you're missing the point here. Many companies ship their code as > .so's and java .classes and .NET clr not for obfuscation, but for > copyright. They spent a lot of money using their employees time to > generate valuable code and don't want to share it in a fashion that would > make it easy to copy/embed/integrate with their competitor. Plain and > simply. And fair and reasonably, from my point of view. >
And obfuscation is their method of copyright protection, so everything I said still applies.
