On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 08:06:30 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
On 11/05/12 00:28, Mehrdad wrote:
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 22:23:15 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 10/05/2012 23:12, Mehrdad wrote:
How do you decide if something is 'critical', 'major',
'blocker', or
just 'normal'? Is
there a rule of thumb I could use?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity
Stewart.
Hmmm... thanks for the link.
I'm having trouble understanding how to apply them, though.
For example, why are these bugs "critical"?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5314
Because an error message with no clue of where it happened, is
pretty much the same as a segfault. It's far more important
than any other 'diagnostic' bug.
I reduced the criticity because I saw Walter do the same for a
similar bug with the commment in the lines of: "A wrong error
message isn't critical"
