On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 07:34:19AM +0700, Ary Manzana wrote: > On 5/13/12 4:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >On 5/11/12 10:38 PM, Ary Manzana wrote: > >>Add a binarySearch(range, object) method that does all of that? > >> > >>I mean, I don't want to write more than a single line of code to do a > >>binarySearch... > > > >assumeSorted(range).contains(object) > > > >is still one line, safer, and IMHO more self-explanatory. > > > >Andrei > > Ok. When more people start saying that they can't find a > binarySearch method... will you change your mind? :-) [...]
Things like this just needs to be properly documented. Just because it isn't called "binarySearch" doesn't mean anything. We aren't trying to reinvent C#. T -- Marketing: the art of convincing people to pay for what they didn't need before which you can't deliver after.
