Re: Getting the const-correctness of Object sorted once and for all

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, May 13, 2012 20:40:51 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/13/2012 8:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > This is in definite contrast to C++ where you
> > _can_ avoid const completely if you want to.
> 
> That's because C++ const is just documentation for the programmer, and
> offers no reliable enforcement.