On Saturday, 26 May 2012 at 08:52:06 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 26-05-2012 10:48, Francisco Almeida wrote:
I vote for destroy().
It seems to be a popular choice, and it isn't ambiguous in any
way.
Are there any classes/structs using destroy() methods in
Phobos?
Francisco
It doesn't actually matter. It wouldn't be ambiguous. UFCS
prefers the method on a class/struct over a free function.
It wouldn't break existing types, yes, but would probably cause
confusion similar to clear() right now if the name was already in
(widespread) use.
David
