On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 15:04:40 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
Looks like a bug.
ValueUser.getValue() is translated to
ValueUser.m_valueImpl.getValue()
with alias this resolution. In here:
1. ValueUser.m_valueImpl is a valid expression. It means just a
symbol
of variable which declared in ValueUser struct.
2. ValueUser.m_valueImpl is only used for overload resolution of
calling getValue() and getValue is static member function, then
it is
*never* evaluated even in run-time.
Please file a report about it in bugzilla.
Kenji Hara
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Which one of the following is
a bug?
1) The fact that ValueUser.getValue() can't be evaluated at
compile time
2) The fact that ValueUser.getValue() compiles and can be
evaluated at runtime
I'm very new to the language. Just finished reading the book and
I'm testing things out.
