On 05/30/2012 12:52 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-05-2012 00:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:42:29 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
Is it by design that Ddoc does not emit documentation for manifest
constants, or is it a bug? I'd really like to have documentation for
some public manifest constants in my code, and I can't really think of a
reason why Ddoc shouldn't handle them.
I'd definitely argue that any public declaration outside of a function or
unittest block which has a ddoc comment on it and is compiled in (e.g.
not
part of another version block or static if) should appear in the
generated
ddoc. If there's one that doesn't, it's a bug.
- Jonathan M Davis
OK, filed: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8160
There doesn't seem to be any problem with dmd 2.095 (Linux 64bits).
This code:
/// Defines the version of ImageMagick where these headers are based on.
enum MagickLibVersion = 0x677;
///ditto
enum MagickLibVersionText = "6.7.7";
Results in the folowing documentation:
file:///home/mike/Projects/DMagick/docs/c/magickVersion.html
--
Mike Wey
