On 5/30/12 12:26 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-05-2012 21:17, deadalnix wrote:
Le 29/05/2012 23:33, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 5/29/12 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I would say that breaking things here, with the right deprecation
process, is the way to go.
So what should we use for mutex-based synchronization if we deprecate
synchronized classes?
Andrei
I missed that message. I don't think synchronized classes should go
away. I think synchronize on non synchronized classes should go away.
This is something I can agree on.
Then I'm unclear what we disagree about.
Andrei
