On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:32:55 -0400, Roman D. Boiko <[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2012 at 20:26:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:13:49 -0400, Mehrdad
Can you use "null"?
Hm... now that null has its own type, I likely could.
I suppose that would map properly to 0.
-Steve
But if the key is non-nullable this might be confusing, or even not
possible.
Well, you could say that null keys are not allowed. But then it makes no
sense for null not to work in other places.
I really am not sure this works well, I think it would be too confusing.
map[null] = 5; // set the first element to 5?
map[null..4] = 6; // set all the elements with keys before 4 to 6
map!keyType k = null;
map[k..$]; // likely an error.
I really actually think I like using map.begin better than null...
-Steve
