On Thursday, 7 June 2012 at 06:33:41 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2012 at 05:04:30 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
no programming language will save you from that
LINQ isn't exactly susceptible to SQL injection. :P
I would consider Linq to SQL more of a library than a language,
even though it has compiler support. It's also something that
should be doable in D (and in a more optimized way than in C#),
especially if that __traits(codeof) pull gets added.
Huh.. for me, it's exactly the opposite.
You can use LINQ with _any_ library that provides the
functionality.
The library itself doesn't really do much -- it's the syntax (&
transformation) that's the key!
